Table 2 Descriptive data from participants in the qualitative interviews (round 1;N = 14)) and validity assessments (round2:N = 15)
From: Development and psychometric testing of a scale to measure effective rural emergency transfer (RET)
Round 1 | Round 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | ||
Number of respondents invited | 16 | 100% | 16 | 100% | |
Response rate | 14 | 88% | 15 | 93.8% | |
Sex | Female | 5 | 35.7% | 5 | 33.3% |
Male | 9 | 64.3% | 10 | 66.7% | |
Age | 31–40 | 1 | 7% | 2 | 13.3% |
41–50 | 9 | 64.3% | 9 | 60.0% | |
51–60 | 4 | 28.6% | 4 | 26.7% | |
Professional Designation | Emergency Nurse | 4 | 28.5% | 5 | 33.3% |
Paramedic | 4 | 28.5% | 4 | 26.7% | |
Emergency Physician | 6 | 43% | 6 | 42.9% | |
Primary Site of Work | Academic setting | 3 | 21% | 3 | 20.0% |
Clinical setting | 8 | 57% | 9 | 60.0% | |
Both academic and clinical | 3 | 21% | 3 | 20.0% | |
Highest level academic of qualification | Bachelor’s degree | 6 | 42.9% | 6 | 40.0% |
Master’s degree | 8 | 57.1% | 9 | 60.0% | |