Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of traditional in-hospital trauma care model and new in-hospital trauma care model

From: The effect of a new in-hospital trauma care model on the outcomes of severely injured trauma patients in the emergency department: a retrospective observational study in China

Subject

Traditional model

New model

Manpower

  

Trauma MDT

No

Yes

Trauma resuscitation team

“1 doctor + n nurses” without clear division of responsibilities

“2 doctors + 3 nurses” with clear division of responsibilities

Assessment and training

1. Monthly competency assessments;

2. Lack of penetration of advanced training

1. Monthly competency assessments and simulation drills;

2. Medical staff received ACLS and CTCT training

Method

  

Trauma alert and activation

1. Collaboration between EMS, hospital ED, and traffic police (detailed early warning information);

2. Trauma activation based on trauma alert and triage

1. Collaboration between EMS and hospital ED (simple phone alerts);

2. No trauma activation

Initial assessment

ABCDE assessment

Routine specialist assessment

Other treatment

Hospital-wide fast-track services

ED-only fast-track services

Material

TRU with corresponding emergency items

Lack of a TRU and centralized item management

Management

Digital trauma care management platform including electronic handover forms, PDA system, trauma case database, etc.

Lack of a digital trauma care management platform, relying on paper-based handover forms

  1. MDT, Multidisciplinary Team; ACLS: Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support; CTCT: China Trauma Care Training; ED, Emergency Department; EMS, Emergency Medical Services; TRU, Trauma Resuscitation Unit